![]() ![]() No, wore her iconic white bikini, which exposed her midriff and navel. Marilyn Monroe was allowed to expose her navel in Something's Got to Give (1962) and later commented, "I guess the censors are willing to recognize that everybody has a navel." Ursula Andress, appearing as Honey Ryder in the 1962 James Bond film, Dr. )īy the 1960s, community standards had changed. (The film was condemned by the National Legion of Decency, but for other reasons. I got a terrible infection from it." Marilyn Monroe, for a scene from Some Like It Hot (1959), wore a dress that revealed skin everywhere but had a small piece of fabric to hide her navel. Kim Novak wore a ruby jewel in her navel for the film Jeanne Eagels (1957) saying in an interview, "they had to glue it in every time. To get around the censors' guidelines, she wore a jewel, a ruby, in her navel. įrankie Avalon and Annette Funicello in publicity photo for the series of Beach Party films, 1963ĭuring the 1950s, Joan Collins was prohibited by the censors from exposing her navel in Land of the Pharaohs (1955). The National Legion of Decency, a Roman Catholic body guarding over American media content, also pressured Hollywood to keep clothing that exposed certain parts of the female body, such as bikinis and low-cut dresses, from being featured in Hollywood movies. In the United States, the Motion Picture Production Code, or Hays Code, enforced after 1934, banned the exposure of the female navel in Hollywood films. Exposure of the navel by females is commonly associated with the popularity of the bikini, the crop top, and low-rise clothing. The exposure of the male navel has not been as controversial nor as common, and is usually in the context of barechestedness. It is also inappropriate to wear clothing that reveals the midriff in professional settings like places of work. Although American teenage girls are more likely to wear shirts that reveal their midriffs, this kind of clothing is often banned in high schools and stores. Ĭommunity perceptions have changed and exposure of female midriff and navel is more accepted today and in some societies or contexts it is both fashionable and common, though not without its critics. Eventually, only female navel exposure was banned and not male because, it was argued, the simulation or upward displacement from vagina to navel was commonplace and obvious in women. The public exposure of the male and female midriff and bare navel has been taboo at times in Western cultures, being considered immodest or indecent. The views, customs and fashions relating to the midriff and navel change from time to time, and such exposure has become more widely acceptable, as reflected in the designs of clothing. In some cultures the navel is seen as sexually and culturally significant, and its exposure has been subject to a variety of cultural norms and taboos, based on concepts of modesty. The cultural views on the midriff navel vary significantly. Please relocate any relevant information into other sections or articles. This article contains a list of miscellaneous information.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |